Investing: How to exploit Portfolio Managers' Soft Rules

Soft rules aren't in law (as opposed to hard rules), but they run the show.

Oct 14, 2025

closeup photo of yellow 5-petaled flower — Photo by Michael Payne on Unsplash

Core thesis

Markets aren’t “free”; they’re efficient to constraints. Portfolio Managers (PMs) optimize career/mandates, not truth. Your edge: know the soft rules, anticipate the forced flows, and be the only player who doesn’t have to sell.
Lens: incentives > ideals · control > fairness · stability > truth. Always read revealed preference.

Soft Rules (the ones that actually run the show)

S1. Career/Benchmark Risk

Stray too far from benchmark → career risk. Closet indexing is the baseline.
Effect: under-ownership of controversial compounders until index inclusion.

S2. Drawdown Tripwires

Internal guardrails (e.g., −8% month / −15% quarter) auto-shrink positions.
Effect: forced de-risking during volatility spikes, regardless of thesis.

S3. Optics & Quarter-End Theater

Window dressing: dump losers, pile into benchmark mega-caps for the fact-sheet.
Effect: predictable flows into index heavies; exit pressure on small/illiquid.

S4. Committee/Model Discipline

Committees won’t approve “weird” theses (e.g., “technocracy substrate = Palantir”).
Effect: real edge gets sized down, even when numbers are obvious.

S5. Capacity/Liquidity Caps

If a position can’t be exited at 3–5× ADV, size is cut.
Effect: chronic under-sizing of names right before liquidity inflects.

S6. Reputational/ESG Veto

“Surveillance/governance winners” under-owned; IR can’t say the quiet part.
Effect: multi-year misweights in state-embedded software/security.

S7. Platform Conservatism

Big platforms prefer scale, low headline risk, low tracking error.
Effect: true alpha under-allocated until consultants bless it.

S8. Incentive Comp Geometry

Annual bonus tied to relative performance → being early hurts more than being wrong.
Effect: consensus herding; delayed adoption of outlier winners.

S9. Organizational Inertia

New ideas require risk sign-offs; “slow” ≈ “no.”
Effect: timing friction you can front-run.

Forced-Seller Mechanics

F1. Value at Risk(VaR)/Vol Targeting

VaR = σ × exposure × z. When σ jumps, VaR breaches even if price is flat → mechanical de-grossing (risk-parity, levered macro, vol-target funds).

F2. Margin/Haircut Spiral

Exchange & Prime Broker margin hikes → cut gross not because you’re wrong, but because math.

F3. Liquidity Promises → Cash Calls

Daily-liquidity funds sell the most liquid winners to meet outflows (not the dogs).

F4. Mandate Breaches

Downgrades/ESG flags/issuer caps → non-discretionary sell tickets.

F5. Policy Shocks

Short bans / sanctions / Acceptable Use Policy changes at banks, app stores, clouds → forced unwinds.

Result: mispricings widen precisely when expected value improves. That’s your window.

VaR Shock Timeline (how it usually flows)

T0: Shock headline → VIX/MOVE spike; bid vanishes; ETF/futures basis goes weird.
T1: Liquid stuff gets sold first (mega-caps, index futures) to raise cash fast.
T2: Margin/haircut hikes → more delever; cross-asset correlations race to 1.
T3: Policy smoke (facilities, swap lines) precedes specifics.
T4 (turn): “Exhaustion day” — down big → close flat/up; credit/funding spreads stall.
T5 (repair): Vol compresses; quality/mandate winners rip; junk lags.

Hard tells:

VIX > 40 and MOVE > 150; ETF discounts widen (SPY/HYG/LQD); futures/cash basis kinks; dealer gamma deeply negative; margin circulars from Prime Brokerages.

How to Exploit VaR shocks

Before (Set the Trap)

Pre-build a buy list of state-embedded compounders (PLTR > MSFT > PANW).
Define staggered limits (−3/−5/−8/−12%) good for 48–72h.
Track PSC (Policy Synchronization Coefficient - synchronization between allies) and LPI (Legibility Pressure Index - frequency of attest/revoke/lineage/rollback verbs in RFPs/laws); rising = bigger sizing later.

During (Be the Liquidity)

Start scaling when 2–3 signals align: Net Liquidity +$100B/4wk flips positive, VIX/MOVE spike, ETF discounts, margin hikes.
Prefer cash equity/ETF over perps; if options, buy call spreads (IV rich).
Add on exhaustion reversal.

After (Clip the Narrative)

Trim into “clarity” PR (facility announced, standard harmonized, big award), then overwrite calls while IV stays sticky.
Expect consultants/indexes to arrive late — that’s your distribution.

Checklist (decision aid)

Default: Who chose it? (If not you, assume it benefits them.)
Friction: What’s one-click vs ten-click? (Flows follow friction.)
Mandates: Which buyers are inelastic? (Banks/insurers/pensions/sovereigns.)
Optics: Can a Portfolio Manager write this thesis in an Limited Partner letter? (If not, it’s under-owned.)
Liquidity: Can the street exit 3–5× ADV? (If not, sizes are capped — your edge.)
VaR: Are σ and margins rising? (Prepare to buy what they love but must sell.)
Standards: Do drafts say attest/revoke/lineage/rollback? (Spend incoming.)
Perimeter: Can app stores/banks/clouds enforce without new laws? (Cheaper than legislation → sooner than consensus thinks.)

Compact Glossary (what you actually need)

PSC — Policy Synchronization Coefficient: How fast allied rules harmonize. ↑ = global TAM for compliance vendors.
LPI — Legibility Pressure Index: Density of attest/trace/rollback verbs in Requests for Proposals/laws. ↑ = buy lineage/admissibility platforms.
Paperization Ratio (Bitcoin): ETF/futures/custody share. ↑ = vol ↓; harvest carry, keep a small sovereign tail hedge.
Net Liquidity (US): Fed BS − TGA − ON/RRP (4w delta). + = risk-on tailwind.

Bottom line

Don’t debate ideals. Instrument constraints. Soft rules create predictable, repeatable dislocations. Your job is to:

Front-run standards & perimeters (PSC/LPI).
Buy the forced-seller tape (VaR/MOVE/VIX/margin tells).
Distribute into clarity (index/consultant arrivals).

Everything else is theater.

None of this should be considered investment advice.

Other articles I’ve written on investing:

Other articles I’ve written on Bitcoin & Gold:

Subscribe:

Share: