Investing: Policy Synchronization Coefficient/Legibility Pressure Index tracking
PSC tells you how global & how fast the rulebook is converging. LPI tells you how hard the evidence bar is.
A) One-line definitions
PSC — Policy Synchronization Coefficient
How fast and how tightly rules/controls converge across jurisdictions and platforms (governments and gatekeepers like Apple/Google/MSFT/AWS/banks).LPI — Legibility Pressure Index
How hard buyers/regulators demand admissible evidence (identity, lineage, rollback, revocation) baked into systems — “policy as parameters.”
Meta-lens: incentives > ideals; control > fairness; stability > truth. Read revealed preferences (app store Acceptable Use Policies, bank memos, procurement templates), not speeches.
B) Scoring templates (0–100 each)
PSC score (weight / signal / how to read)
Cross-jurisdiction copy speed (25%)
0 = isolated pilot; 100 = US/EU/UK publish near-identical text within 90 days.
Data: date deltas between official texts, regulator circulars.
Platform alignment (25%)
0 = no platform move; 100 = Apple/Google app-store + AWS/Azure + major banks ship new Acceptable Use Policy (AUP)/policy templates globally.
Data: AUP diffs, SDK/API deprecations, wallet/app distribution rules.
Standards crystallization (20%)
0 = blog posts; 100 = named standards (e.g., C2PA, FIDO, ISO, FATF) mandated in Requests for Proposals (RFPs) or certification regimes.
Data: RFP language, certification checklists.
Procurement harmonization (15%)
0 = bespoke Statements of Work (SOWs); 100 = shared master templates / mutual recognition of audits.
Data: identical clauses across agencies; “mutual recognition” language.
Enforcement readiness (15%)
0 = guidance; 100 = fines, delistings, traffic-shaping, payment blocks begin.
Data: first penalty, takedown SLAs, bank risk bulletins.
PSC ≥ 70 = global rulebook convergence is live. Compliance-first vendors scale internationally.
LPI score (weight / signal / how to read)
Evidentiary verbs in law/RFP (30%)
0 = accuracy talk; 100 = attest / prove / trace / authorize / revoke / rollback / retain / explain are mandatory.
Data: verb counts weighted by bindingness.
Court/agency precedent (25%)
0 = none; 100 = cases/fines where lack of lineage/explainability kills evidence or triggers penalties.
Data: rulings, consent decrees, regulator notices.
Platform provenance requirements (20%)
0 = optional; 100 = provenance/watermarking required for distribution/ads/payments.
Data: app-store/CDN/ad-platform policies.
Buyer spend mix shift (15%)
0 = “move-fast analytics”; 100 = line items for audit, lineage, governance grow >20% YoY.
Data: RFP budgets, vendor SKUs.
Rollback/kill-switch acceptance (10%)
0 = absent; 100 = explicit revocation/rollback controls in contracts.
Data: SOW clauses, DPIA/PIA artifacts.
LPI ≥ 70 = evidence bar is high. Only platforms that emit signed, court-grade artifacts win and renew.
Quadrant logic (what to own/avoid)
PSC: High
LPI: High
Reality: Synchronized, evidentiary enforcement
What wins: Palantir (lineage OS), MSFT (Entra/Compliance/Purview), PANW (policy-grade cyber)
What dies: “Move-fast” AI, point analytics without governance
PSC: High
LPI: Low
Reality: Rules align, weak evidence bar
What wins: Payment rails (V/MA), basic KYC, cheap compliance wrappers
What dies: Heavy governance stacks (overkill); niche privacy toys
PSC: Low
LPI: High
Reality: Strong evidence demand, fragmented rules
What wins: Local champions with audit depth; consulting + compliance hybrids
What dies: Global “one-size” without localization
PSC: Low
LPI: Low
Reality: Sandbox phase
What wins: Speculative infra, pilots
What dies: Anything betting on near-term mandates
Trade principle: Buy fear → Monetize clarity. Accumulate when PSC/LPI rise but headlines scream “overreach/backlash”. Trim/overwrite when consultants/indexes finally bless it.
D) Trigger verbs & artifacts
PSC verbs: adopt, harmonize, align, mutual recognition, standardize, mandate, require.
LPI verbs: attest, prove, trace, retain, authorize, revoke, rollback, explain.
Non-government PSC: any global Acceptable Use Policy or SDK change by Apple/Google/AWS/Azure or Tier-1 banks = PSC up, even if no statute moved.
E) Field examples
PSC↑: AI provenance: C2PA moves from “nice-to-have” to distribution requirement in app stores/CDNs; EU/UK/US push aligned language within a quarter.
LPI↑: Court excludes AI-generated output lacking dataset rights + decision lineage → agencies update RFPs to require prove/rollback/retain.
F) Weekly routine (30–45 minutes)
PSC sweep: scan new laws, app-store/bank/cloud AUPs, FATF/ISO/FIDO/C2PA updates; timestamp copy speed across US/EU/UK.
LPI sweep: scrape RFPs and recent rulings for evidentiary verbs and rollback clauses; log first fines.
Score & delta: update PSC/LPI 0–100, track 4-week trend.
Act:
PSC↑ & LPI↑: add to PLTR/MSFT-Gov/PANW; sell calls on clarity pops.
PSC↑ & LPI↓: overweight payments/KYC wrappers.
PSC↓ & LPI↑: pick localized compliance winners.
Both ↓: hold core; wait for a fear catalyst.
G) Portfolio translation
Core long: PLTR (policy OS with lineage/rollback), MSFT (identity/compliance default), PANW (policy-grade security).
Hard assets outside the system (Bitcoin, Gold).
Tactical: Buy into backlash hearings and “overreach” op-eds (PSC/LPI rising under noise); sell some into “clarity” PR waves.
H) Common failure modes (avoid)
Mistaking speeches for PSC. If Apple/Google/banks didn’t move, PSC didn’t move.
Buying “AI accuracy.” If it can’t prove/trace/rollback, it won’t pass procurement.
Underestimating ratchets. “Pilots” in low Gross Consent Product regimes rarely sunset. Price in durability.
Bottom line:
PSC tells you how global & how fast the rulebook is converging.
LPI tells you how hard the evidence bar is.
When both climb, policy-grade, court-ready platforms monopolize, renewals entrench, and multiples justify themselves. Your edge is seeing the PSC/LPI climb before consultants can put it in a deck — and trading the fear→clarity cycle with discipline.
None of this should be considered investment advice.
Other articles I’ve written on investing:
How people and systems handle complexity (investment implications)
What inflation/real-rate band maximizes system stability with minimal consent drawdown
Why Mainstream Media is pushing the debasement trade (Gold, Bitcoin)
What the financial system is designed to do (First Principles)
Constrained Efficient Market Hypothesis (how Prices get made)
Analyzing The Great Taking (systematic, global seizure of assets)
The Purpose of Mainstream Financial Media (read them like a book)
Other articles I’ve written on Bitcoin & Gold:
Why Mainstream Media is pushing the debasement trade (Gold, Bitcoin)
Permissionless technology ≠ permissionless adoption (implications for Bitcoin)
Game Theory: How Governments could delegitimize Bitcoin Maximalism
Subscribe:
Share: