What the U.S. Treasury actually does + Investment Implications

Treasury’s job in this regime isn’t “truth in price discovery.” It’s keep USTs money-like, USD settlement hegemonic, and shocks short—even if that means quiet repression (mildly negative real rates).

Photo by Bro Takes Photos on Unsplash

What the Controllers want from the U.S. Treasury (UST)

1) Keep USTs as the indispensable collateral of the planet

Incentive: If all roads clear through Treasuries, you indirectly govern global funding.
Revealed preference:

• Central clearing mandates, buyback discussions, standing facilities, and dealer backstops whenever the market wobbles.

• Regulatory capital rules (Basel/LCR/SLR/HQLA) that force banks/insurers to hold USTs.

• Money Market Fund rules + ON/RRP plumbing that soak excess cash into bills/USTs on command.

Why: The more money-like USTs are, the larger the convenience yield (lower coupons, deeper demand, faster policy transmission). Collateral utility beats coupon math.

2) Engineer financial repression without announcing it

Incentive: Inflate debt away quietly; avoid protracted recessions (which destroy consent).
Revealed preference:

• Tolerating 3–4% CPI bands while keeping real rates ~0–1%.

• Issuance skew to bills (to manage term premium), QT that can be tapered, and “emergency” facilities to cap tail risk.

• Rapid backstops instead of “purges” (BTFP-style, 13(3)-like reflexes).

Why: Short shocks + fast patches cost less consent than long austerity. Nominal growth + mild inflation erodes real debt — no speeches required.

3) Preserve USD hegemony as the policy weapon

Incentive: Payments, sanctions, and custody that clear in USD = jurisdiction over adversaries and allies.
Revealed preference:

• Sanctions-by-API: expanding entity lists, correspondent-bank pressure, and KYC/AML norms exported via SWIFT/OFAC.

• Tokenization pilots (tokenized funds/USTs) that keep the asset USD-native even if the pipe is “crypto-ish.”

• Swap lines that bind allied central banks to the dollar in every crisis.

Why: A world that must hold and transact in USD/UST gives you the off-switch everywhere else.

4) Move money to programmable rails you can parameterize

Incentive: Make disbursements/tax/benefits conditional and auditable at settlement time.
Revealed preference:

• Real-time tax (CTC), e-invoicing, stablecoin/tokenized-deposit pilots before CBDC — because you can push this via banks/app stores without a vote.

• Identity, provenance, lineage standards creeping into payments and content simultaneously.

Why: If identity + money + provenance are linked, defaults enforce policy. Consent becomes optional.

5) Avoid failed auctions at any cost

Incentive: A disorderly Treasury market is a regime risk.
Revealed preference:

• Dealer balance-sheet relief just in time (SLR tweaks, collateral eligibility).

• Issuance calendars tilted to bills when duration indigestion appears; buyback chatter when street inventory is choked.

• Fast “communication puts” whenever term premium surges.

Why: If primary issuance falters, the operating system bluescreens. Everything else is secondary.

How their words diverge from their deeds (and why it’s rational)

• Talk: Pure price discovery, “market-led outcomes”, fiscal prudence.

• Do: Design captive demand (capital rules), captive plumbing (RRP/TGA knobs), captive settlement (USD-only critical links), and captive narratives (stability over truth).

• Conclusion: Markets are “efficient” to the constraints they set, not to textbook CAPM.

Investment implications (where the edge sits)

A) Core longs (structural)

1. Policy-grade software & identity/provenance rails

   • Palantir (PLTR): policy lineage, admissible AI, crisis command; wins when consent is scarce.

   • Microsoft (MSFT): Entra/Compliance/Purview + Gov cloud = the default enforcement surface.

   • Palo Alto (PANW) for mandated attestation and edge enforcement.

2. Programmable payments middleware

   • V/MA: tax-split, ID-bound settlement, tokenized deposits; the “CBDC-without-CBDC” rails.

3. Commodities

   • Bitcoin, Gold held outside the system for regime-break convexity.

Execution: Add on Value at Risk/liquidity scares (MOVE>120, Net Liquidity −$100B 4-week), trim/overwrite calls on “clarity” ramps (regulatory wins, big award PRs).

B) Relative value & curve views

• Steepener bias over time: Bills-heavy issuance contains the front; deficits + term premium tantrums pull the long end — buy steepeners on policy hints of QT taper or bill skew.

• Real-rate cap: Expect reluctance to let real rates stay high → multiples for quality growth stay supported.

• USD path: Stability bias, not a secular collapse; use USD strength spikes (crisis) to reload risk.

C) “Don’t fight the plumbing” shorts/underweights

• Labor-heavy Systems Integrators (SIs) without software annuity (compliance eats their hours).

• High-duration hopes with no policy utility (glossy AI toys; no lineage/rollback/admissibility).

• Regional banks during curve stress (HTM duration + deposit beta risk).

• “Open” consumer apps that will run headlong into ID/age-gate/app-store policy walls.

Bottom line

Treasury’s job in this regime isn’t “truth in price discovery”. It’s keep USTs money-like, USD settlement hegemonic, and shocks short — even if that means quiet repression (mildly negative real rates) and engineered demand. The words will stay about prudence and markets; the deeds will keep optimizing collateral utility, captive demand, and programmable rails.

If you invest where policy utility is the P&L (not an ESG slogan), you’re on the right side of the asymmetry:

• Own the control software (PLTR), the default surface (MSFT), the enforcement edges (V/MA/PANW).

• Bitcoin and Gold are great for regime-break convexity. Make sure to keep yours outside the system.

None of this should be considered investment advice.